Comments on: Waterproof Digital Camera – Canon PowerShot D10 12.1 MP

By: gene

gene — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:50:18 +0000

The D 10 is a nice little camera with one above blemish . The way the wrist and close band affix to the camera is by way of a actual appropriate wrist band mount. After the arise there is no way to cautiously use the camera as intended. Addition botheration is that the added straps bank $130 — That’s appropriate $130 for a brace of close straps .

My camera accustomed after the appropriate arise . When I alleged Canon I was told the allotment was backordered 4-6 weeks. I alternate the camera . A anniversary after the arise accustomed in a box big abundant for two cameras. The appropriate arise is an accidental aggravation and does not add any functionally to the D 10. I will not acquirement addition D 10 because of this architecture “innovation”

By: paulette

paulette — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:33:13 +0000

I bought this camera afterimage unseen.. I bare a bunched waterproof camera that took annual affection shots.. I adulation the product.. A bit added asperous anatomy would accomplish it a 5-star.. However, I am not blessed with the seller.. For starters the packing was poor and the box came dented.. Very little absorption was paid to packaging what should be advised a aerial product.. There was additionally no assurance agenda in the box alike admitting the specs said it was allotment of the package.. This makes me admiration what I got? Several emails and a few weeks accept anesthetized with no activity on teh allotment of the seller.. I will not buy from them afresh as I abhorrence that I accept bought a blah market, refurbed, or article else??? I gave them 3 weeks to boldness this and nothing.. Terrible service…

By: mab

mab — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:00:31 +0000

I waited patiently for the Canon D10 to arrive. Canon makes abundant cameras and article on par with their best point and shoots that is waterproof sounds wonderful. The botheration is that Canon dumbed bottomward this camera so abundant that is is not abundant of a camera at all. I am abiding that it will booty abundant snapshots but for $300+, I accepted abundant more.

The zoom ambit is not actual useful, there are no chiral ascendancy options and abrogation out HD video... what were they thinking. I am abiding that the admiral that be at Canon absitively that the best plan was to accomplish their aboriginal waterproof camera basically idiot-proof and again chase it up with accustomed versions of their added avanced cameras bottomward the road. Well, they succeded with the idiot-proof goal. The botheration is that the amount that this camera commands is way to high, based on its capabilities.

I capital a waterproof camera to booty with me on my kayak while fishing in the kelp beds off of San Diego. I absolution best of my angle so the photo I booty is generally the alone affair that proves I was on the baptize and not at the bar. After assuredly accepting my easily on the D10, I autonomous to aces up a actual analytic priced Panasonic ZS1, , at Costco for about $100 less.

The ZS1 is a abundant bigger camera for the money. While I would accept adopted a waterproof camera, for the time being, I will aloof accept to resort to befitting the Panasonic in a artificial bag while out fishing.

I am a big Canon fan and am assertive that one of these canicule they will absolution a waterproof camera that befits the Canon name. The D10 is aloof not a actual acceptable effort.

By: will

will — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:19:15 +0000

Everything about this camera is absurd EXCEPT for one little thing…when we opened the box the srtap arise was missing. Now,tell me how are you declared to use a UNDERWATER camera after a stap. Now we accept to buy the 128.00 acessory kit in adjustment to be able to use it on lur trip. I am actual dissapointed that this wasnt there. Although, from what i accept apparent so far it is a acceptable camera that is accessible to use and is not “dummie proof”.

By: perry

perry — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:17:24 +0000

are you badinage me? this camera is marketed for asperous alfresco use, but assize let the best aerial allotment of the camera unprotected. above architecture flaw.

update: i thoroughly activated this camera, and i can candidly say that it deserves a 1-star. what absolutely kills it is the auto mode. in auto mode, there is ample auto focus lag. it gets annoying back you are aggravating to booty a account and the awning keeps activity from bleared to bright as the camera is aggravating to auto focus–which sometimes takes added than 1-second. secondly, every distinct account that i accept taken in auto approach has a chicken hue to it. i am not abiding if this is due to the camera acrimonious an ISO that is too high/low.